Survey link:
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/CHH3HM8
Monday, November 19, 2012
Tuesday, November 13, 2012
Criminology Survey
Criminology Survey
Do you agree with the
criminal justice system?
What are the two
classes of crime, in order of severity, from least to greatest?
In
the following section, give each listed crime a rating of severity with 1 being
the least severe and 10 being most severe.
You may use the same number multiple times. A rating of 0 may be given if the item should
not be considered a crime.
Murder
Underage Drinking
Illegal Drug Use
Rape
Drunk Driving
Speeding
J-Walking
Loitering
Arson
Theft
Vandalism
Thursday, November 1, 2012
Schooling Article
This article explained the assimilation of cultures and races through certain schooling. The focus of the
specific case of aboriginal people being targeted is a strong example and point in the article. I strongly agree
on the points made about religion in schools. Such attempts at assimilation through religious conversion tend
to be extremely effective on younger generations and therefore most useful in schools.
The rights, practices, and beliefs of native people must be conserved in order to prevent overpowering
groups and monopoly like power structures within government. Schooling is the best way to do this.
specific case of aboriginal people being targeted is a strong example and point in the article. I strongly agree
on the points made about religion in schools. Such attempts at assimilation through religious conversion tend
to be extremely effective on younger generations and therefore most useful in schools.
The rights, practices, and beliefs of native people must be conserved in order to prevent overpowering
groups and monopoly like power structures within government. Schooling is the best way to do this.
Friday, October 12, 2012
Food in the Environment
I have found that there is not a lack of food in the environment in which I live. However, there is a large
amount of overly processed food. It is unknown whether or not this is harmful to the people within the area,
but it is likely that it is not beneficial. I believe that the lack of food awareness is a cause for the passivity of
those who eat this food. If they were to know how it was made and where it came from, they would likely
have a different opinion of it.
The sustainability of this environment has been increased by poor food practices, but the natural aspects
of it has also been destroyed. Using livestock in great quantities has made it sustainable, but the process of
doing this is horrible to the environment, the consumers, and the animals.
Tuesday, October 2, 2012
Environmental Teaching
One of the most important things for future
generations to know is how to take care of the earth. The best way to accomplish this is to teach
them ourselves. In order to do that, we
must first know how to do this for ourselves.
Currently, human society kills thousands of creatures in order to
survive and wastes many of the products of such slaughter. “Likewise, living beings and organic habitats
are being culled and destroyed in the name of human production and consumption
at staggering rates” (Kahn). It is
unethical not to teach young people about such a waste of resources.
Thursday, September 27, 2012
Response
to Environmental Science Articles
I believe that the proper response to any environmental
concern is to stop immediately the possible problem activity until the validity
of the claim can be determined. As the
most intelligent form of life on this planet, it is the responsibility of the
human race to take care of the earth for all life now and in the future. Such responsibilities must be handled in the
appropriate way.
The issue with pumping chemicals into the ground in order
to cause fractures is that the chemicals are then free to move about within the
earth, contaminating the soil and the groundwater. Such reckless processes are surely known by
the perpetrators to be illogical and irresponsible. These people must be held accountable for the
damage they so willingly bring to the world.
Often, the public can be a wonderful source of ideas for
the advancement of environmental concerns.
Not all plans are workable, but the large quantity of such plans means
that some surely must be beneficial. Power
is not a prerequisite for correctness.
In most cases it is the opposite.
Only by working together can society become less of a treat to the earth.
Friday, September 7, 2012
Turtle
Island Response
Having read a few of the poems in “Turtle Island”, I have
come to the conclusion that Gary Snyder not only cares greatly about the
environment, but also has a difficult to read writing style. The only one that was easy to follow was “Facts”,
which I didn’t realize was part of the poem series until I realized that every
chapter didn’t start with a similar writing.
Also, I have noticed that most of the poems focus on what people are
doing to the environment now compared to how we acted in the past.
Tuesday, August 28, 2012
Response to Quiz and Podcast
The
bioregion quiz is a very valuable test of a person’s ability to survive should there
be some kind of catastrophe. Finding
answers to the questions posed can tell a lot about the environmental dependency
humans have lost or have overused. For example the quiz asks when shadows are
shortest. Knowing such information can
inform a resident of the best time to plant or what weather to expect.
Bill
McKibben posed some other environmental concerns in his podcast. One of McKibben’s points was that the
environmental decline caused by humans was occurring much faster than had been
predicted. Society must respond to these
concerns or else there will be even greater consequences in the near
future.
Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Light Pollution in Cities
Light
Pollution
I believe that one of the problems that we face today is
light pollution. You can tell where
cities are in the distance by the glow they give off at night. This is a real problem if you want to look at
the stars, as they are blocked by light pollution. Now this can cause some animals to lose their
way when they are trying to navigate at night.
With Island civilization, there would be light pollution in far fewer
locations on the earth, which would mostly solve the problem. Most people don’t even consider light to be
something that can pollute, but in fact it can.
With island civilization we can not solve all of our problems but at
least we can solve enough to hopefully give nature a chance to thrive once
again.
Now to solve the light pollution problem within the
island civilizations we would need to realize that we are creating far more
light than we need. Not only is it wasteful
but it is the main source of light pollution.
If we were to use dimmer lights, we could eliminate this problem even
now possibly. Also, this would save
unimaginable amounts of energy that could be used for much more important
things.
In conclusion, light pollution may not kill us but it is
a problem, a problem that we can solve even now. We can gain so much from lowering our light
output. We have the technology, we just aren’t
using it.
Monday, August 20, 2012
Island Civilization Reflection
Island
Civilization Reflection
Imagine a world where the Earth has been choked by
overpopulation of the human race. That
could one day be a reality based on Nash’s Island
Civilization. The article suggests
that the division of civilization and the wilderness is becoming an increasingly
severe problem for the planet and everything that lives on it. Humans are the only life forms on Earth that
do permanent harm to their surrounding environment. The human race is progressing towards total
control of the environment. This planet
is a resource, a resource that we can not yet live without. The most important thing we have here is
diverse life, without which we could not survive. Only through major changes in human society
and responsibility can we save our future.
The Island civilization theory states that small pockets of human
civilization would live in spaced out “island” cities in order to allow the
wilderness to thrive once again. This
would work very well for the wilderness but would also be terrible for human
life as we know it today.
Based on the idea that the only salvation for the future
being an unimaginable decrease in human population, it would seem that the
outlook is not good. Our current society
is based on control of the outside environment.
With this pattern of throwing away, nature will not sustain life on this
planet. The best way to move forward on
this subject is to move away from nonrenewable resources and move towards more
sustainable power sources. That way we
no longer have to destroy the wilderness in search of more resources. Only by changing our behavior can we stop
ourselves from going down the path to extinction that we have paved for so many
other species. Now we are destroying
resources such as the rainforests without even using them.
I believe that some of the predictions in this article
could possibly be accurate for our future.
However, none of the options given for solutions are likely to please
current or future society. Unless better
solutions can be found, I believe that people will not put their hearts into
the change we need to save our future for our children. If we don’t, we are likely to end up in the
trash world situation discussed in the article.
We need to prevent this from happening.
We cannot let human evolution cause worldwide devolution of nature.
In conclusion, we can not go on living like
parasites. We have to change or the
world will change us, possibly by killing us from lack of resources. As the most intelligent species on the
planet, it is our duty to take care of our surroundings so that they will be
usefull to future generations of all life here.
Island civilization may not be the solution we need, but it is proof
that there are a few among us who are looking to our future. As it was said in the article, “now we are the
death star, but we are also capable of changing course.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)